24
                
              
            
            
              
                Geotechnical News • June 2014
              
            
            
              
                www.geotechnicalnews.com
              
            
            
              
                GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION NEWS
              
            
            
              usefulness in targeted applications
            
            
              with frequent monitoring requirements
            
            
              or large anticipated deformations.
            
            
              SAA instruments are linear arrange-
            
            
              ments of linked elements with MEMS
            
            
              accelerometers manufactured to
            
            
              prescribed lengths for installation in
            
            
              geotechnical environments. By relat-
            
            
              ing the segment lengths and the tilt
            
            
              (calculated from the sensor inclinations
            
            
              with respect to gravity) of each seg-
            
            
              ment with reference to a fixed end, the
            
            
              spatial position of the array can be cal-
            
            
              culated. As the array moves with time,
            
            
              subject to geotechnical effects, defor-
            
            
              mation along the array is measured,
            
            
              providing information on both the rate
            
            
              and magnitude of the movements. Fig-
            
            
              ure 1 shows a typical up-hole system
            
            
              cabinet and a team installing a SAA
            
            
              sensor in a vertical borehole.
            
            
              
                Performance
              
            
            
              Based on an assessment of SAA
            
            
              data from several project sites and
            
            
              applications, the system performance
            
            
              has been found to be sufficient for
            
            
              transportation applications, particu-
            
            
              larly where relatively large deforma-
            
            
              tions (meters) are being measured.
            
            
              After seven years, Minnesota Depart-
            
            
              ment of Transportation
            
            
              (MnDOT)
            
            
              SAA sensors, except for those that
            
            
              have been sheared off by exceptional
            
            
              deformations, continue to function
            
            
              well. SAA systems appear to provide
            
            
              similar accuracy (at the ground or
            
            
              structural surface) to that achieved by
            
            
              robotic total station systems, with the
            
            
              added advantage that movement inside
            
            
              soil masses is characterized. In our
            
            
              experience, we have not observed any
            
            
              systemic data quality effects due to
            
            
              sensor compression, extension, align-
            
            
              ment, twist, temperature sensitivity, or
            
            
              other inherent ‘device’ characteristics.
            
            
              SAA sensors do display occasional
            
            
              spurious readings due to electrical or
            
            
              other effects—absolute data integrity,
            
            
              as with most electronic sensors, is
            
            
              not perfect. Filtering or engineering
            
            
              judgment may be required to prop-
            
            
              erly interpret SAA response. As SAA
            
            
              sensors are manufactured to speci-
            
            
              fied lengths, the array length cannot
            
            
              be changed “on the fly” in the field if
            
            
              changes are made to the monitoring
            
            
              program. Advanced planning of instal-
            
            
              lations is required; the fixed length
            
            
              of the sensor arrays can also limit the
            
            
              efficient reuse of the sensors at new
            
            
              sites.
            
            
              Automation,
            
            
              particularly when
            
            
              everything is
            
            
              working properly,
            
            
              can lead to
            
            
              undesirable user
            
            
              complacency and
            
            
              poor practice.
            
            
              
                Automation
              
            
            
              A particular strength of the SAA,
            
            
              which is also present in in-place incli-
            
            
              nometers, is the ability of the sensor
            
            
              to remain in-situ and for data to be
            
            
              automatically collected and transmit-
            
            
              ted to a web-based data storage and
            
            
              presentation system in near-real-time.
            
            
              However, a warning is appropri-
            
            
              ate. Automation, particularly when
            
            
              everything is working properly, can
            
            
              lead to undesirable user complacency
            
            
              and poor practice. Schedules should
            
            
              be established to regularly check
            
            
              that automated systems are properly
            
            
              functional. Additionally, automation
            
            
              should not be seen as a substitute for
            
            
              site visits and application of the obser-
            
            
              vational method. Fewer site visits may
            
            
              have the unintended consequence of
            
            
              removing opportunities for important
            
            
              field observations and better under-
            
            
              standing of mechanisms and triggers
            
            
              causing deformation. Geo-engineering
            
            
              requires an appreciation of site char-
            
            
              acteristics that are not always well
            
            
              captured at-a-distance.
            
            
              Related beneficial aspects to sen-
            
            
              sor automation include the ability to
            
            
              establish movement thresholds, event
            
            
              triggers, and automated warnings. A
            
            
              bi-monthly interval was previously
            
            
              considered ‘frequent’ for traditional
            
            
              inclinometer installations. With system
            
            
              automation, it is now possible to read
            
            
              sensors several times daily—allowing
            
            
              for the collection of data sets capable
            
            
              of accurately depicting movement
            
            
              trends, such as seasonal variation, and
            
            
              discrete events such as those induced
            
            
              by contractor operations, rainfall, or
            
            
              earthquake. SAA systems can also
            
            
              provide near-real-time information to
            
            
              multiple users at multiple locations
            
            
              (via the web) with comparative ease,
            
            
              making the systems especially useful
            
            
              for construction monitoring where
            
            
              contractors and owners, in different
            
            
              locations, have an interest in immedi-
            
            
              ate information for decision making.
            
            
              With increased data frequency there
            
            
              is also the potential for improved
            
            
              data interpretation. If a particular
            
            
              
                Figure 1. Typical SAA up-hole cabinet (left) and crew installing a SAA sensor in a
              
            
            
              
                borehole (right).