 
        
          
            Geotechnical News •   June 2017
          
        
        
          
            
              29
            
          
        
        
          
            THE GROUT LINE
          
        
        
          Few holes required an additional sec-
        
        
          ond stage of cement grouting. When
        
        
          the differential settlements between
        
        
          the pillars were strongly reduced, the
        
        
          silica grout was injected, working
        
        
          gradually along the area to be treated.
        
        
          The effect of this injection stage is
        
        
          shown by the yellow line in (Fig.10);
        
        
          an average uplift of about 5 mm was
        
        
          induced.
        
        
          At the end of the treatment, the sheet
        
        
          wall execution was also completed in
        
        
          the area in front of pillars nr. 6 to nr. 3.
        
        
          The sheet elements were now driven
        
        
          into the ground without vibration. The
        
        
          green curve in the following figure
        
        
          11 evidences the effect of this work
        
        
          on the structure. Settlements of about
        
        
          5 mm were measured in the zone
        
        
          besides the activities, while pillars
        
        
          nr. 8 and 9, showed a very reduced
        
        
          settlement (less than 1.5 mm) after the
        
        
          compaction grouting works.
        
        
          Finally, the excavation between the
        
        
          driven sheet walls and the following
        
        
          reinforced concrete lining cast was
        
        
          carried out in the following 4 months.
        
        
          Low residual settlements were
        
        
          measured, varying from 1.5 mm to
        
        
          3 mm, in the range expected by the
        
        
          structural designers. The effect of the
        
        
          treatment, together with the different
        
        
          execution methods used, definitely
        
        
          allowed for reduction of the sensitivity
        
        
          
            Figure 11. Pillars nr. 10, 6, 8 and 4R3 displacements during all the working
          
        
        
          
            phases.
          
        
        
          
            Figure 10. Pillars’ displacements during the time.
          
        
        
          
            Figure 12. Warsaw worksite.
          
        
        
          
            Figure 13. Warsaw worksite (2).