 
        
          
            Geotechnical News •   June 2017
          
        
        
          
            
              21
            
          
        
        
          
            GEOHAZARDS
          
        
        
          study of the deposit and the collapse
        
        
          scar we processed oblique helicopter
        
        
          digital photos taken with a standard
        
        
          SLR camera. For the observations of
        
        
          the flank prior to the collapse, we used
        
        
          digitized historical vertical aerial pho-
        
        
          tos. We processed both oblique photos
        
        
          and vertical historical aerial photos
        
        
          with the commercial SfM software
        
        
          package PhotoScan. SfM is a powerful
        
        
          tool for geologists and geomorpholo-
        
        
          gists and quickly becoming standard
        
        
          technique in interpretive geoscience.
        
        
          
            Structure from Motion
          
        
        
          Originally, Structure from Motion
        
        
          (SfM) refers to the computing vision
        
        
          problem of reconstructing the geom-
        
        
          etry of an object (Structure) from a
        
        
          moving sensor (Motion). With the
        
        
          use of SfM, the three-dimensional
        
        
          geometry of scenes and objects can
        
        
          be retrieved from sequential two-
        
        
          dimensional images by measuring
        
        
          geometric differences between images.
        
        
          In geoscience, SfM refers to a com-
        
        
          posite workflow of Structure from
        
        
          Motion and Multi View Stereo (MVS)
        
        
          algorithms. The SfM process matches
        
        
          features between images, estimates
        
        
          the camera position and parameters,
        
        
          and delivers a sparse point cloud in
        
        
          generic x, y, z object coordinates. The
        
        
          MVS increases the number of matches
        
        
          to generate a denser point cloud. The
        
        
          point cloud can be then georeferenced
        
        
          by adding ground control points
        
        
          (GCP) and interpolated to generate
        
        
          digital elevation models (DEM).
        
        
          The use of SfM does not require
        
        
          specialized personnel or expensive
        
        
          software, making three-dimensional
        
        
          modelling accessible to everyone. This
        
        
          technique is broadly applied from the
        
        
          hand-sample reconstruction to outcrop
        
        
          modelling and medium scale topogra-
        
        
          phy generation. SfM-derived DEMs
        
        
          have been proven to be of comparable
        
        
          quality to Lidar DEMs. While SfM is
        
        
          most often used with imagery taken
        
        
          from a hand-held camera or unmanned
        
        
          aircraft vehicles (UAV)few studies
        
        
          have explored the application with his-
        
        
          torical aerial photos. Limitations exist
        
        
          related to the automated workflow
        
        
          where errors are difficult to identify
        
        
          and control, however, recent work has
        
        
          focused on assessing and reducing
        
        
          such errors allowing broader accep-
        
        
          tance of SfM
        
        
          SfM allows for a rapid and high-
        
        
          resolution cartographic production
        
        
          effective in the assessment of natural
        
        
          disasters. For landslides it can be used
        
        
          to generate post-event topography, to
        
        
          get sequential DEMs of slow moving
        
        
          landslides, or to perform kinematic
        
        
          analysis of joints and discontinuity
        
        
          sets.
        
        
          There are many open source and
        
        
          commercial SfM packages available.
        
        
          We used PhotoScan to reconstruct the
        
        
          2010 Mt Meager landslide deposit,
        
        
          landslide scar and the slope distress of
        
        
          the flank prior to the collapse.  Photo-
        
        
          scan includes, in a single package, the
        
        
          whole workflow from image match-
        
        
          ing to orthophoto and DEM extrac-
        
        
          tion, allowing point cloud and mesh
        
        
          editing. Its efficiency, straightforward
        
        
          workflow, and a user-friendly interface
        
        
          has made Photoscan successful with
        
        
          a wide scientific literature to prove its
        
        
          reliability and precision.
        
        
          
            The 2010 Mt Meager landslide
          
        
        
          In 2010 the south flank of Mt Meager
        
        
          (British Columbia, Canada) failed
        
        
          catastrophically (Figure 1) generat-
        
        
          ing the largest (~50 Mm3) landslide
        
        
          in Canadian history (Guthrie et al.,
        
        
          2012). The collapse evolved as four
        
        
          structurally controlled sub-failures that
        
        
          retrogressed from the base of the flank
        
        
          to the peak of the mountain (Roberti et
        
        
          al., in press.). The rock mass fractured
        
        
          forming a rapid debris avalanche that
        
        
          reached peak velocity of 90 m/s, ran
        
        
          up to 270 m on the valley sides and
        
        
          travelled 12.7 km damming Capricorn
        
        
          Creek for 19 h and partially damming
        
        
          Lillooet River for 2 h.
        
        
          SfM-derived base maps were used
        
        
          for detailed descriptions of the
        
        
          deposit and revealing the separation
        
        
          of a water-rich frontal debris flow
        
        
          and a water-poor, less mobile debris
        
        
          avalanche core in the landslide event.
        
        
          The SfM analysis of historical aerial
        
        
          photos over Meager Peak allowed
        
        
          the description of the ongoing slow
        
        
          deformation on the flank responding to
        
        
          glacier pulsations at its base. We cal-
        
        
          culated the volume of the collapse and
        
        
          the geometry of the sub-failures by
        
        
          
            Figure 1. Photograph of the main collapse of Mt Meager. Note helicopter for
          
        
        
          
            scale (photograph courtesy of R. Guthrie).